Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2018; 9(3): 14-23
Published online Mar 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14
Table 1 Sacroiliac joint range of motion for an intact model and 22 configurations of implant orientation, superior implant length, and number of implants
Treatment/orientationImplant placed
Superior implant ending pointSI joint ROM (°) [Reduction in ROM (%)]
SuperiorMiddleInferiorFlexion-extensionLateral bendingAxial rotation
Intact----11.94° (-)0.66° (-)1.11° (-)
Inline orientationXXXMid-ala0.7° (64%)0.45° (32%)0.41° (63%)
Mid-sacrum0.63° (68%)0.41° (38%)0.38° (66%)
X-XMid-ala0.82° (58%)0.47° (29%)0.44° (60%)
Mid-sacrum0.69° (64%)0.43° (35%)0.4° (64%)
XX-Mid-ala0.97° (50%)0.5° (24%)0.49° (56%)
Mid-sacrum0.76° (61%)0.45° (32%)0.43° (61%)
-XX-10.91° (53%)0.53° (20%)0.55° (50%)
X--Mid-ala1.36° (30%)0.58° (12%)0.67° (40%)
Mid-sacrum1.21° (38%)0.58° (12%)0.61° (45%)
-X--11.32° (32%)0.65° (2%)0.73° (34%)
--X-11.25° (36%)0.69° (-5%)0.79° (29%)
Transarticular orientationXXXMid-ala0.59° (70%)0.41° (38%)0.34° (69%)
Mid-sacrum0.52° (73%)0.38° (42%)0.31° (72%)
X-XMid-ala0.69° (64%)0.42° (36%)0.36° (68%)
Mid-sacrum0.58° (70%)0.39° (41%)0.32° (71%)
XX-Mid-ala0.81° (58%)0.45° (32%)0.4° (64%)
Mid-sacrum0.64° (67%)0.41° (38%)0.35° (68%)
-XX-10.76° (61%)0.47° (29%)0.46° (59%)
X--Mid-ala1.36° (30%)0.58° (12%)0.67° (40%)
Mid-sacrum1.21° (38%)0.58° (12%)0.61° (45%)
-X--11.11° (43%)0.6° (9%)0.7° (37%)
--X-11.05° (46%)0.62° (6%)0.73° (34%)