©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2017; 8(3): 256-263
Published online Mar 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.256
Published online Mar 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.256
Table 1 Optoelectronic markers placement following anatomical landmarks according to Blondel et al[13] gait analysis protocol
| Parameters | |
| Head | Vertex: 1 |
| Nasion: 1 | |
| Tragus: 2 | |
| Trunk - thorax | Acromion: 2 |
| Manubrium: 1 | |
| Xiphoid: 1 | |
| C7: 1 | |
| T6: 1 | |
| T9: 1 | |
| Trunk - abdomen | T12: 1 |
| L3: 1 | |
| S1: 1 | |
| Pelvis | ASIS: 2 |
| Lower limbs - thighs | Femoral shaft: 2 |
| Lateral femoral condyle: 2 | |
| Lower limbs - legs | Tibial shaft: 2 |
| Lateral malleolus: 2 | |
| Lower limb - feet | Calcaneus: 2 |
| 2nd metatarsal head: 2 |
- Citation: Pesenti S, Blondel B, Peltier E, Viehweger E, Pomero V, Authier G, Fuentes S, Jouve JL. Spinal alignment evolution with age: A prospective gait analysis study. World J Orthop 2017; 8(3): 256-263
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v8/i3/256.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.256