©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2017; 8(10): 798-808
Published online Oct 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.798
Published online Oct 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.798
Table 2 Modified Coleman Methodology Score
| Score | ||
| Part A: Only 1 score to be given for each section | ||
| Number of study patients | ||
| > 60 | 10 | |
| 41-60 | 7 | |
| 20-40 | 4 | |
| < 20, not stated | 0 | |
| Mean follow-up (mo) | ||
| > 24 | 5 | |
| 12-24 | 2 | |
| < 12, not stated or unclear | 0 | |
| Number of different surgical procedures included in each reported outcome | ||
| 1 | 10 | |
| > 1, but > 90% of patients undergoing the 1 procedure | 7 | |
| Not stated, unclear, or < 90% of subjects undergoing the 1 procedure | 0 | |
| Type of study | ||
| Randomized controlled trial | 15 | |
| Prospective cohort study | 10 | |
| Retrospective cohort study | 0 | |
| Diagnostic certainty (MRI) | ||
| In all | 5 | |
| In > 80% | 3 | |
| In < 80% | 0 | |
| Description of surgical procedure given | ||
| Adequate (technique stated and necessary details of that type of procedure provided) | 5 | |
| Fair (technique only stated without elaboration) | 3 | |
| Inadequate, not stated, or unclear | 0 | |
| Description of postoperative rehabilitation | ||
| Well described (ROM, WB, and sport) | 10 | |
| Not adequately described (2 items between ROM, WB, and sport) | 5 | |
| Protocol not reported | 0 | |
| Part B: Scores may be given for each option in each of the 3 sections if applicable | ||
| Outcome criteria | ||
| Outcome measures clearly defined | 2 | |
| Timing of outcome assessment clearly stated (e.g., at best outcome after surgery or follow-up) | 2 | |
| Objective, subjective, and imaging criteria | 6 | |
| 2 items between objective, subjective, and imaging criteria | 4 | |
| Objective, subjective, or radiological criteria | 2 | |
| Procedure for assessing outcomes | ||
| Patients recruited (results not taken from surgeons' files) | 5 | |
| Investigator independent of surgeon | 4 | |
| Written assessment | 3 | |
| Completion of assessment by patinets themselves with minimal investigator assistance | 3 | |
| Description of patient selection process | ||
| Selection criteria reported and unbiased | 5 | |
| Recruitment rate reported | ||
| > 80% | 5 | |
| < 80% | 3 | |
| Eligible patients not included in study satisfactorily accounted for or 100% recruitment | 5 | |
- Citation: Shimozono Y, Yasui Y, Ross AW, Miyamoto W, Kennedy JG. Scaffolds based therapy for osteochondral lesions of the talus: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2017; 8(10): 798-808
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v8/i10/798.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i10.798