©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2016; 7(6): 383-391
Published online Jun 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i6.383
Published online Jun 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i6.383
Table 2 Correlations with the gait deviation index, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient displayed
| Parameter | Correlation coefficient, ρ |
| Participant characteristics | |
| Age | -0.13 |
| BMI | -0.27 |
| Age at amputation | -0.16 |
| Time since amputation | 0.14 |
| Performance-based outcomes | |
| nSLpro | 0.73b |
| nSLint | 0.83b |
| nSLave | 0.78b |
| nSSWS | 0.7b |
| TUGT | -0.60 |
| 6MWD | 0.74b |
| Self-report measures | |
| Ambulation | 0.44 |
| Appearance | 0.22 |
| Frustration | -0.14 |
| Perceived response | 0.02 |
| Residual limb health | -0.22 |
| Social burden | 0.37 |
| Sounds | -0.01 |
| Utility | 0.33 |
| Well-being | 0.20 |
- Citation: Kark L, Odell R, McIntosh AS, Simmons A. Quantifying prosthetic gait deviation using simple outcome measures. World J Orthop 2016; 7(6): 383-391
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i6/383.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i6.383