Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2016; 7(5): 315-337
Published online May 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i5.315
Table 4 Methodological quality assessment of randomized trials utilizing Interventional Pain Management techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment criteria
Manchikanti et al[102]Carette et al[103]Fuchs et al[104]Nath et al[105]van Wijk et al[97]van Kleef et al[99]Tekin et al[96]Civelek et al[108]Dobrogowski et al[98]Cohen et al[109]Ribeiro et al[107]Moon et al[100]Lakemeier et al[101]Yun et al[106]
I Trial design and guidance reporting
(1) Consort or spirit33332222232222
II Design factors
(2) Type and design of trial23233332222222
(3) Setting/physician21133322222211
(4) Imaging33233333233333
(5) Sample size32211111132222
(6) Statistical methodology11111111111111
III Patient factors
(7) Inclusiveness of Population
For facet joint interventions:21021110110210
(8) Duration of pain22122320200220
(9) Previous treatments20000012000221
(10) Duration of follow-up with appropriate interventions32122222101121
IV Outcomes
(11) Outcomes assessment criteria for significant improvement44244222202221
(12) Analysis of all randomized participants in the groups22222222222022
(13) Description of drop out rate21222222222222
(14) Similarity of groups at baseline for important prognostic indicators22222222222222
(15) Role of co-interventions10011111111111
V Randomization
(16) Method of Randomization22222222222222
VI Allocation concealment
(17) Concealed treatment allocation22122222202222
VII Blinding
(18) Patient blinding11011110101110
(19) Care provider blinding11011110100100
(20) Outcome assessor blinding01001000000100
VIII Conflicts of interest
(21) Funding and sponsorship23120320022221
(22) Conflicts of interest33130320023330
Total4540264236403728292832323837