Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2016; 7(12): 826-831
Published online Dec 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i12.826
Published online Dec 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i12.826
Table 3 Paper vs online after the introduction of the online database
| Total elbow prosthesis | Radio-capitellar prosthesis | Radial head prosthesis | Revision surgery | Total | |
| Questionnaires sent in total | |||||
| Paper | 49 | 5 | 24 | 22 | 100 |
| Online | 20 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 43 |
| Response rate | |||||
| Paper | 91.90% | 100.00% | 83.30% | 100.00% | 92.00% |
| Online | 90.00% | 100.00% | 83.30% | 100.00% | 90.70% |
| Completeness of questionnaires | |||||
| Paper | 48.90% | 40.00% | 65.00% | 59.10% | 54.40% |
| Online | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Mean age (yr) | |||||
| Paper (SD) | 68 (8) | 58 (8) | 50 (14) | 63 (10) | 63 (12) |
| Online (SD) | 68 (8) | 50 (3) | 50 (13) | 55 (16) | 59 (14) |
| Mean age (yr) | |||||
| Responders (SD) | 68 (8) | 55 (7) | 50 (13) | 61 (13) | 62 (13) |
| Non-responders (SD) | 67 (10) | - | 36 (13) | - | 52 (19) |
- Citation: Viveen J, Prkic A, The B, Koenraadt KLM, Eygendaal D. Effect of introducing an online system on the follow-up of elbow arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2016; 7(12): 826-831
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i12/826.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i12.826