Surgical interventions for anterior shoulder instability in rugby players: A systematic review

Table 4 Summary table on patient outcomes, recurrence of instability, complications and study quality

Ref.	Post-operative evaluation tools	Recurrence of instability	Complications	Mean follow up months (range)	Mean Coleman Methodology Score
Neyton et al[23]	Radiographic, Walsh-Duplay score (mean 86), Rowe score (mean 93), VAS score (mean 1.6)	0/37	3/37 (1 glenoid fracture, 1 post op haematoma, 1 pseudoarthrosis of bone block)	144 (68-237)	58
Bonnevialle et al[21]	Mean external rotation decreased 6.2 degrees, Rowe (excellent for 86%), Walsh-Duplay (excellent for 80%), patient satisfaction (88%), Samilson radiographic degeneration in 32%	6/31	None stated	82 (60-120)	48
Larrain et al[26]	Acute: Rowe 33/40 excellent, 4/40 good, 2/40 poor	Arthroscopic acute (2/40)	1/198 (radial paraesthesia)	68.4 (39.6-99.6)	55
	Recurrent: Rowe 105/158 excellent, 6/158 good, 10/158 poor)	Recurrent (10/158)
Goldberg et al[24]	ROM normal except external rotation 70% and internal rotation 60% compared to contra-lateral side	0/6	None	34.3 (12-50)	42.5
Burkhart et al[25]	Not stated	Non osseous lesion (6/87 re-dislocated), osseous (8/9 re-dislocated )	Not specified	Not stated	35

ROM: Range of motion.