Computerised tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for modeling of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

doi:10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 6, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7770)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

351

WORD

318

HTML

3080

Figures (1-3)

122

Tables (1-3)

133

Sum=4004

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

592

Download

1107

Sum=1699

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1158

Download

909

Sum=2067

Mar 18, 2015 (publication date) through May 8, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (10)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews

World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2015; 6(2): 290-297
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot for outlier incidence using computerised tomography.

Citation: Stirling P, Valsalan Mannambeth R, Soler A, Batta V, Malhotra RK, Kalairajah Y. Computerised tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for modeling of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2015; 6(2): 290-297
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i2/290.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290