Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2014; 5(5): 591-596
Published online Nov 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591
Published online Nov 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591
Table 3 Thirteen year New Zealand Joint Registry reasons for revision for loosening by fixation method n (%)
| Fixation/n | Loose cup | Loosestem | Unstable | Deep infection | Pain | Femoral fracture |
| Cemented/870 | 415 (48) | 148 (17) | 200 (23) | 105 (12) | 86 (10) | 74 (8.50) |
| Hybrid/1117 | 160 (14) | 235 (21) | 384 (34) | 157 (14) | 136 (12) | 141 (11) |
| Reverse Hybrid/19 | 4 (21) | 1 (5) | 5 (26) | 4 (21) | 2 (11) | 3 (16) |
| Uncement- ed/1313 | 198 (15) | 192 (15) | 307 (24) | 124 (9) | 222 (17) | 141 (11) |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.003 | < 0.001 | 0.208 |
- Citation: Wyatt M, Hooper G, Frampton C, Rothwell A. Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement. World J Orthop 2014; 5(5): 591-596
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v5/i5/591.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591