Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2013; 4(3): 144-153
Published online Jul 18, 2013. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.144
Table 3 Comparison of talus-1st metatarsal, 1st-5th metatarsal, and calcaneus-5th metatarsal angles between patients treated with the Ponseti method and surgically managed patients
StudiesPatientsFeetTalus-1st metatarsal
1st-5th metatarsal
APmean (95%CI)Lateralmean (95%CI)Lateralmean (95%CI)APmean (95%CI)
All treatments5166551.27 (-0.23-2.77)6.24 (5.00-7.48)15.6 (16.7-17.9)-5.11 (-6.83 - -3.40)
Ponseti method1472240.96 (-0.59-2.51)5.51 (4.20-6.82)15.4 (14.7-16.1)-6.49 (-8.33 - -4.65)
Ippolito et al[1]32490.94 (-1.01-2.89)6.39 (4.40-8.38)15.5 (14.2-16.7)-6.8 (-9.20 - -4.40)
Laaveg et al[5]70104--14.7 (13.5-15.9)-4.9 (-6.92 - -2.88)
Cooper et al[6]45711 (-1.56-3.56)5 (3.60-6.40)16 (14.8-17.2)-8 (-10.33 - -5.67)
Soft-tissue release2834316.04 (-0.06-12.13)12.08 (8.38-15.79)25.2 (19.3-31.0)3.86 (-0.84 - 8.57)
Ippolito et al[1]32478.28 (5.97-10.59)9.4 (6.69-12.11)22.1 (20.3-23.9)-0.62 (-3.04 - 1.80)
Dobbs et al[3]457315.95 (13.24-18.66)7.68 (4.06-11.30)18.1 (15.4-20.8)10.32 (8.55 - 12.09)
Fridman et al[10]50713.97 (1.27-6.67)--1.32 (-0.70 - 3.34)
Singh et al[12]183311.9 (9.89-13.91)15.7 (13.14-18.26)28.2 (25.9-30.5)-
Prasad et al[13]30506.92 (2.49-11.35)18.54 (11.90-25.18)46.2 (38.7-53.7)5.8 (2.22 - 9.38)
Herbsthofer et al[15]386210.29 (7.68-12.90)--9.95 (7.90 - 12.00)
Abulsaad et al[16]5470-5.43 (-6.85-4.02)---
Docquier et al[17]1625-3.5 (-6.52-0.48)10.9 (6.43-15.37)15.9 (12.7-19.1)-3.9 (-7.04 - -0.76)
Difference between treatmentQ = 2.50, P = 0.11Q = 10.74, P = 0.001Q = 10.48, P = 0.001Q = 16.12, P < 0.001