BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Evidence Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2026; 17(7): 121094
Published online Jul 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.121094
Table 3 Summary of minimally invasive treatments for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Technique
Principle
Advantages
Limitations
Typical indications
Percutaneous vertebroplastyDirect polymethylmethacrylate cement injectionRapid pain relief, shorter operative time, lower costLimited height restoration, leakage concernAcute/subacute painful fracture when stabilization is prioritized and procedural burden should be minimized
Percutaneous kyphoplastyBalloon cavity creation followed by cement fillingBetter height restoration, better kyphosis correction, lower-pressure injectionHigher cost, more procedural stepsAcute/subacute fracture with substantial collapse, deformity, or need for partial height restoration
Stent-assisted kyphoplastyExpandable stent maintains cavityPotential structural support and resistance to recollapseLimited evidence, higher costSelected severe collapse cases
Navigation- or robot-assisted augmentationTechnology-guided puncture and cement deliveryHigher accuracy, less radiation, potentially better cement distributionEquipment cost and limited availabilityComplex anatomy, difficult puncture, or revision setting


Write to the Help Desk