Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2026; 17(7): 121094
Published online Jul 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.121094
Published online Jul 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.121094
Table 3 Summary of minimally invasive treatments for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
| Technique | Principle | Advantages | Limitations | Typical indications |
| Percutaneous vertebroplasty | Direct polymethylmethacrylate cement injection | Rapid pain relief, shorter operative time, lower cost | Limited height restoration, leakage concern | Acute/subacute painful fracture when stabilization is prioritized and procedural burden should be minimized |
| Percutaneous kyphoplasty | Balloon cavity creation followed by cement filling | Better height restoration, better kyphosis correction, lower-pressure injection | Higher cost, more procedural steps | Acute/subacute fracture with substantial collapse, deformity, or need for partial height restoration |
| Stent-assisted kyphoplasty | Expandable stent maintains cavity | Potential structural support and resistance to recollapse | Limited evidence, higher cost | Selected severe collapse cases |
| Navigation- or robot-assisted augmentation | Technology-guided puncture and cement delivery | Higher accuracy, less radiation, potentially better cement distribution | Equipment cost and limited availability | Complex anatomy, difficult puncture, or revision setting |
- Citation: Wang SC, Sheng B. Minimally invasive vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. World J Orthop 2026; 17(7): 121094
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i7/121094.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.121094