Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2026; 17(7): 121094
Published online Jul 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.121094
Published online Jul 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.121094
Table 1 Comparison of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty
| Parameter | Percutaneous vertebroplasty | Percutaneous kyphoplasty |
| Main principle | Direct cement injection | Balloon-assisted cavity creation followed by cement filling |
| Operative burden | Lower | Higher |
| Height restoration | Limited | Better |
| Kyphosis correction | Limited | Better |
| Leakage control | Depends heavily on injection control | Potential advantage as injection usually involves lower pressure |
| Typical clinical use | Rapid stabilization in frail patients or those with less deformity | Acute/subacute fracture with greater collapse or deformity |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
- Citation: Wang SC, Sheng B. Minimally invasive vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. World J Orthop 2026; 17(7): 121094
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i7/121094.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.121094