Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2026; 17(7): 120372
Published online Jul 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.120372
Published online Jul 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.120372
Table 1 Indications, contraindications, and key selection criteria for intramedullary headless screw vs Kirschner wire vs plate fixation in metacarpal and proximal phalanx fractures
| Criterion | IMHS | K-wire | Plating |
| Extra-articular transverse/oblique | Preferred | Acceptable | Acceptable |
| Metacarpal neck | Preferred | Acceptable | Less ideal |
| Comminuted diaphyseal | Acceptable | Poor control | Preferred |
| Intra-articular | Contraindicated | Limited role | Preferred |
| Osteoporotic bone | Caution | Acceptable | Preferred |
| Open fracture Gustilo I | Acceptable | Acceptable | Acceptable |
| Open fracture Gustilo II/III | Contraindicated | Caution | Preferred |
| Pediatric (open physes) | Contraindicated | Preferred | Rarely |
| Need for early motion | Best | Poor | Good |
| Resource-limited setting | Costly | Best | Moderate cost |
| Learning curve | Moderate | Low | Moderate-high |
- Citation: Emara KM, Diab RA, Hussein M, Abuelwafa M, Eissa MO. Clinical considerations in intramedullary headless screw fixation of metacarpal and proximal phalanx fractures. World J Orthop 2026; 17(7): 120372
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i7/120372.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.120372