Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2026; 17(6): 119961
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119961
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119961
Table 2 Between-group comparison of post-intervention clinical variables, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Placebo group (n = 40) | Intervention group (n = 40) | P value | |
| VAS (cm) | 6.1 (1.3) | 4.1 (1.6) | < 0.001a |
| Strength (N) | 8.2 (2.9) | 13.04 (3.5) | < 0.001a |
| PPT (kg/cm²) | 5.6 (1.1) | 5.9 (1.1) | 0.125 |
| Flexion (º) | 158.9 (13.6) | 168.4 (12.6) | 0.002a |
| Extension (º) | 69.5 (10.0) | 81.4 (9.3) | < 0.001a |
| Aduction (º) | 26.3 (4.9) | 27.9 (3.4) | 0.338 |
| Abducción (º) | 127.8 (32.4) | 163.3 (19.6) | < 0.001a |
| Internal rotation (º) | 66.9 (18.4) | 74.3 (13.1) | 0.104 |
| External rotation (º) | 70.8 (18.0) | 80.5 (12.7) | 0.025a |
- Citation: Rodríguez Fragua I, Briz Benito D, Romero-Morales C, Loaiciga Espeleta C, González Raja R, Sánchez Milá Z, Rodríguez Martín L, Ferreira-Sánchez MDR, Velázquez Saornil J. Effectiveness of low-intensity laser on pain in patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy: A triple-blind randomized controlled trial. World J Orthop 2026; 17(6): 119961
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i6/119961.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119961