Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2026; 17(6): 119956
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119956
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119956
Table 4 Summary of risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention assessments for included papers
| ROBINS | Ref. | Year | Confounding | Selection | Interventions | Deviation | Missing | Outcome | Reporting | Overall |
| 3 | Albayrak et al[23] | 2017 | Serious risk | Low risk | Moderate risk | Low risk | Serious risk | Moderate risk | Low risk | Serious risk |
| 4 | Kretzschmar[15] | 2019 | Serious risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Serious risk | |||
| 5 | Yang et al[22] | 2022 | Serious risk | Low risk | Moderate risk | Moderate risk | Moderate risk | Moderate risk | Low risk | Serious risk |
| 6 | Zhong et al[21] | 2018 | Serious risk | Low risk | Moderate risk | Low risk | Moderate risk | Moderate risk | Low risk | Serious risk |
| 7 | Clendenen et al[20] | 2015 | Serious risk | Low risk | Moderate risk | Low risk | Serious risk |
- Citation: Dias S, Ashworth S, McGonagle S, Divall P, Dias J. Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain post-total knee replacement: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2026; 17(6): 119956
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i6/119956.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119956