Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain post-total knee replacement: A systematic review

Table 2 Summary of quality and bias assessments for included papers

No.	Ref.	Year	Quality: Coleman A	Quality: Coleman B	Bias	Bias method
1	Rienstra et al[18]	2021	95.0	79.1	Low	ROB2
2	Buvanendran et al[25]	2010	91.7	79.1	Low	ROB2
3	Albayrak et al[23]	2017	43.3	48.8	High	ROBINS
4	Kretzschmar[15]	2019	33.3	30.2	High	Single arm used ROBINS
5	Yang et al[22]	2022	16.7	0.0	High	ROBINS
6	Zhong et al[21]	2018	45.0	53.5	High	ROBINS
7	Clendenen et al[20]	2015	40.0	65.1	High	Single arm used ROBINS

ROB: Risk of bias; ROBINS: Risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention.