Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2026; 17(6): 119119
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119119
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119119
Table 4 Comparison between minimally invasive spine surgery and traditional open surgery
| Parameter | MISS | Traditional open surgery |
| Intraoperative blood loss | < 50-100 mL; minimal soft-tissue disruption | 200-500 mL; requires extensive soft-tissue dissection |
| Length of hospital stay | Average 2-4 days | Average 7-10 days |
| Pain relief (VAS) | VAS score reduced by 50%-60% at 1 week postoperatively; further improvement by 2 weeks | Pain relief typically observed around 4 weeks postoperatively; recovery is comparatively slower |
| Complication rate | Overall complication rate < 5%; mainly minor infections and mild transient neurological deficits | Complication rate 10%-20%; includes bleeding, infection, and neurological injury |
| Functional recovery (ODI) | ODI improved by 30%-40% at 3 months; marked improvement by 6 months | ODI gradually improves, reaching approximately 30%-35% improvement at 6 months |
- Citation: Li D, Tang XD, Li ZP, Fu WP, Lu PY, Shi Z, Zhang Q, Fang S, Lv BK, Ruan WJ, Zhang CJ, Wang RB. Minimally invasive spine surgery with endoscopy, navigation, robotics, and artificial intelligence: Clinical evidence and future directions. World J Orthop 2026; 17(6): 119119
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i6/119119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119119