Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2026; 17(6): 119119
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119119
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119119
Table 2 Comparison of surgical techniques and indications
| Technique | Indications | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Endoscope-assisted decompression | DDD; spinal canal stenosis | Minimal tissue trauma, rapid recovery, and reduced intraoperative blood loss; high-resolution imaging improves surgical visualization | Limited indications; steep learning curve; high operative complexity |
| Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy | Mild to moderate disc herniation | Small incision, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay; reduced soft-tissue disruption | Restricted endoscopic field of view and relatively narrow indications; requires high technical precision |
| Robot-assisted surgery | Spinal deformity correction; multilevel spinal fixation | High surgical accuracy and reduced human error; improves pedicle screw placement accuracy and lowers complication rates | High equipment cost and demanding training requirements; complex system maintenance |
| 3D fluoroscopy and real-time navigation | Spinal fixation procedures; pedicle screw placement | High accuracy; lowers the risk of screw misplacement; real-time imaging shortens operative time and reduces radiation exposure | Requires substantial radiation exposure; depends on expensive imaging equipment |
- Citation: Li D, Tang XD, Li ZP, Fu WP, Lu PY, Shi Z, Zhang Q, Fang S, Lv BK, Ruan WJ, Zhang CJ, Wang RB. Minimally invasive spine surgery with endoscopy, navigation, robotics, and artificial intelligence: Clinical evidence and future directions. World J Orthop 2026; 17(6): 119119
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i6/119119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.119119