Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2026; 17(5): 117153
Published online May 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i5.117153
Published online May 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i5.117153
Table 4 Therapeutic options in degenerative disc disease
| Category | Therapy | Main features | Benefits and limitations |
| Conservative management | Physical therapy. Lifestyle modifications (weight loss, smoking cessation, ergonomics) | Strengthens core and paraspinal muscles. Improves posture and flexibility | Reduces mechanical strain. First-line therapy. Requires adherence |
| Lifestyle modifications (weight loss, smoking cessation, ergonomics) | Addresses modifiable risk factors | Slows degeneration. Non-invasive. Patient-dependent | |
| Pharmacological therapy (NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, analgesics) | NSAIDs ↓ COX activity and prostaglandins. Analgesics reduce pain | Short-term relief; risks include gastrointestinal, renal, cardiovascular side effects | |
| Medical pain management | NSAIDs | Anti-inflammatory via COX inhibition | Short-term relief. Limited disc penetration. Systemic risks |
| Opioids | Activate G-protein coupled receptor pathways → inhibit neurotransmission | Effective for severe pain. High risk of addiction and dependence | |
| Muscle relaxants | Reduce muscle spasm | Symptomatic relief. Sedation risk | |
| Epidural corticosteroid injections | Reduce inflammation via COX and arachidonic acid inhibition | Temporary relief. Systemic steroid effects. No long-term benefit | |
| Emerging pharmacologic therapies | Pamidronate | Bisphosphonate inhibiting osteoclasts and bone turnover | Potential pain reduction. Investigational |
| Abaloparatide | Osteoporosis drug shown to reduce IVD degeneration (animal models) | Experimental. No established human benefit | |
| Alpha-2-macroglobulin | Protease inhibitor targeting FAC | Under investigation for slowing degeneration | |
| Surgical management | Discectomy and decompression | Removes herniated disc tissue → relieves nerve compression | Effective for stenosis/herniation. Does not halt degeneration |
| Spinal fusion | Removes disc → inserts cage + hardware. Eliminates motion | Pain reduction. Decreases mobility. Adjacent segment disease | |
| Total disc replacement | Replaces disc with motion-preserving prosthesis | Preserves mobility. Modest benefits vs fusion. Long-term data limited | |
| Biological and regenerative therapies | Platelet-rich plasma | Growth factors (PDGF, VEGF, IGF-1, TGF-β) stimulate ECM synthesis | Promising early results. Inconsistent human data. No standardized protocols available |
| Stem cell therapies | Implantation of regenerative cells into disc to restore ECM and hydration | Early promise. Challenges: Cell survival; microenvironment; delivery | |
| Growth factor therapy (TGF-β, BMP-7) | Enhances matrix production | Experimental. Limited human evidence | |
| Gene therapy | Introduces genes to enhance matrix synthesis or reduce catabolism | Highly experimental. Delivery and safety challenge |
- Citation: Gradisnik L, Prestor B, Zele T, Kocivnik N, Maver U, Velnar T. Pathophysiology and current understanding of degenerative disc disease. World J Orthop 2026; 17(5): 117153
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i5/117153.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i5.117153