Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2026; 17(4): 116521
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116521
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116521
Table 3 Outcome evaluations between intervention and placebo groups
| Ref. | Measured outcomes | Results |
| Brewer et al[6], 2022 | Pain (NRS) | Lower postoperative pain (P = 0.02), lower kinesiophobia (P = 0.77), improved postoperative symptoms (P = 0.002) in cases than controls |
| Kinesiophobia (TSK) | No significant difference in flexion ROM (P = 0.99), extension ROM (P = 0.18), and knee laxity (P = 0.09) between groups | |
| Subjective symptoms (KOS-SAS) | ||
| Knee laxity (KT1000) | ||
| ROM (flex and ext) | ||
| Rhim et al[8], 2020 | Kinesiophobia (TSK) | No significant difference in self-efficacy (P = 0.808), return to sport (P = 0.574), kinesiophobia (P = 0.888), and KOOS subscales (P = 0.236 to 0.916) between groups |
| Return to sport (ACL-RSI) | ||
| Self-efficacy (K-SES) | ||
| Functional status (KOOS) | ||
| Levinger et al[7], 2017 | Self-efficacy (K-SES) | No significant difference in KOOS subscales (P = 0.07-0.76), self-efficacy subscales (P = 0.42 and 0.71), kinesiophobia (P = 0.46), fear of activity (P = 0.96) between groups |
| Functional status (KOOS) | ||
| Kinesiophobia (TSK) | ||
| FABQ | ||
| Zaffagnini et al[9], 2013 | QOL (mental and physical SF-36) | Improved subjective IKDC (P = 0.047), TKS (P = 0.0141) and time to crutches discharge (P = 0.0012). No significant difference in Tegner score, and SF-36 mental and physical status between groups |
| Kinesiophobia (TSK) | ||
| Functional (subjective and objective IKDC, Tegner) | ||
| Crutches use time | ||
| Lebon et al[4], 2012 | Isometric activation of the medial musculature (EMG during maximum knee extension) | Greater postoperative musculature activity in cases than controls (P = 0.02). No significant difference in postoperative pain, ROM, effusion reduction, thigh circumference, LEFS score (P > 0.05) between groups |
| Pain (VAS score) | ||
| Ability to perform daily activities with lower extremity injury using the LEFS | ||
| Magnitude of surgical effusion and atrophy by the circumference of the knee above the kneecap and circumference of the thigh 15 cm above the kneecap | ||
| Knee ROM (goniometry) | ||
| Cupal and Brewer[3], 2001 | Pain (0-10 scale) | Improved pain in cases than placebos (P < 0.05). Reduced re-injury anxiety in cases than placebos (P < 0.05). Greater post-op knee strength in cases than placebos (P < 0.003) |
| Reinjury anxiety (0-10 scale) | ||
| Knee strength (cybex 6000) | ||
| Isokinetic dynamometer |
- Citation: Salimi M, Mafhoumi A, Mosalamiaghili S, Arvin A, Keshtkar A, Lowe W, Akbari H. Effectiveness of motor imagery in postoperative outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. World J Orthop 2026; 17(4): 116521
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i4/116521.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116521