Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2026; 17(4): 116076
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116076
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116076
Table 4 Receiver operating characteristic and regression analysis as reported from the included studies
| Ref. | ROC analysis (cut-off point, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC) | Regression analysis (OR, 95%CI) |
| Chang et al[3], 2018 | LMi-LPW: 6.3 mm, 75.5%, 58.5%, 0.7; LMi-LAD: 112.9 mm2, 83.7%, 43.4%, 0.67; ACLi-LPW: 5.7 mm, 75.5%, 58.5%, 0.68; ACLi-LAD: 209.5 mm2, 66.7%, 65.5%, 0.66 | LMi-LPD: 4.35 (1.86-10.17); ACLi-LPW: 9.22 (2.33-36.54); ACLi-LAD: 6.81 (1.8-25.76) |
| Salari et al[20], 2021 | LMi-LPD: 4.3 mm, 100%, 29%, 0.75 | NR |
| Jain et al[12], 2020 | NR | LMi-LPW: 0.25 (0.06-1.05); LMi-LPD: 0.19 (0.04-0.97) |
| Kim et al[21], 2022 | LMi-LPD: 10.62 mm, 40.4%, 94.12%, 0.678 | LMi-LPD: 9 (1.018-79.545) |
| Liu et al[22], 2023 | LMi-LPW: 7.9 mm, 75%, 90%, 0.897; LMi-LPD: 8.4 mm, 95%, 85%, 0.898 | LMi-LPW: 6.25 (1.59-24.55); LMi-LPD: 1.52 (1.148-2.016) |
| Pu et al[10], 2022 | LMi-LPW: 7.5 mm, 70%, 70.6%, 0.724; LMi-LPD: 7.9 mm, 95%, 58.5%, 0.818 | NR |
| Ringus et al[13], 2010 | LMi-LPD: 10 mm, 79%, 67%, 0.74 | LMi-LPD: 7.89 (2.64-23.59) |
| Tang et al[8], 2017 | LMi-LPD: 11 mm, 70.3%, 61.8% | NR |
| Thamyongkit et al[23], 2018 | NR | NR |
- Citation: Hassan AAA, Khalifa AA, Villalon AR, Hauri D, Zhu TY. Predictive value of preoperative computed tomography parameters for meniscal and cruciate ligament injuries in tibial plateau fractures: Meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2026; 17(4): 116076
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i4/116076.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.116076