Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2026; 17(4): 113710
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.113710
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.113710
Table 2 Clinical outcomes of false positive and false negative cases, n (%)
| Outcome category | False negatives | False positives | Total |
| Outpatient/fracture clinic follow-up | 33 (61.1) | 31 (53.4) | 64 (57.1) |
| CT/MRI performed | 8 (14.8) | 8 (13.8) | 16 (14.3) |
| ED discharge/conservative management | 10 (18.5) | 9 (15.5) | 19 (17.0) |
| Admitted | 3 (5.6) | 6 (10.3) | 9 (8.0) |
| Total | 54 (100) | 58 (100) | 112 (100) |
- Citation: Al Hajaj SW, Soliman K, Zafar M, Garnham C, Al Hajaj D, Elshafie O, Alsswah A, Elwan MH. From subtle breaks to missed diagnoses: Real-world evaluation of an artificial intelligence fracture detection tool. World J Orthop 2026; 17(4): 113710
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i4/113710.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.113710