Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2026; 17(3): 114693
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.114693
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.114693
Table 2 Wearables in orthopedic trauma
| Ref. | Patient population | Wearable device(s) | Key findings |
| Taraldsen et al[91], 2014 | Elderly patients post-hip fracture in RCT | Accelerometer-based activity monitor | Patients receiving comprehensive geriatric care spent more time upright and recovered function more quickly than controls |
| Kammerlander et al[89], 2018 | Older hip fracture patients post-surgery | Pressure-sensing insoles | Patients frequently exceeded prescribed partial weight-bearing. Wearables objectively revealed poor adherence to weight-bearing restrictions |
| Marmor et al[88], 2022 | Patients with orthopedic trauma (systematic review) | Multiple (accelerometers, pressure insoles, etc.) | Wearable monitors are increasingly used to assess recovery post-fracture. Most commonly studied in hip and fragility fractures |
| Lockhart et al[94], 2021 | Community-dwelling older adults | Sternum-mounted IMU | Gait variability and complexity predicted future falls over 6 months with approximately 82% accuracy. Validated use of wearables in fall risk assessment |
- Citation: Wu JA, Kutzer KM, Shenoy DA, Yanez G, Zirbes CF, Shah S, Jing C, Choudhury A, Song J, Mai E, Dhanjani S, Shatkin M, Kim G, Seyler TM, Wu KA. Objective functional assessment in orthopedics: The emerging role of wearable technologies. World J Orthop 2026; 17(3): 114693
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i3/114693.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.114693