BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2026; 17(3): 113746
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.113746
Table 6 Incidence of disease reactivation compared with other similar studies
Ref.
Follow-up
Disease reactivation
Study limitation
Direction for future research
Our study18 months1Advance work-up to rule out pulmonary tuberculosis was not doneCo-existing pulmonary TB should be effectively ruled out
Neogi et al[34], 201041 months1Retrospective case series. Cause of reactivation not mentionedA prospective study with detailed work-up of the cause of disease reactivation is needed
Wang et al[35], 201049 months0Retrospective study with small sample sizeProspective study with larger sample size would be more helpful to generalize the study outcome
Bhosale et al[33], 202010.5 years0Retrospective case series, includes only patient without an active sinus. Exact duration of disease not mentionedProspective study including patients with active sinus would better help to assess the impact of sinus on disease recurrence
Chen et al[43], 202132.1 monthsAseptic loosening = 0; dislocation = 0; recurrence = 0Retrospective study, duration of disease highly variable (9 months to 12 years)Prospective study with lesser variation in duration of disease will be more useful
Kushwaha et al[31], 202414 months0Short follow-up periodA longer follow-up period will be more helpful in assessing implant longevity


Write to the Help Desk