Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2026; 17(3): 113746
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.113746
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.113746
Table 5 Comparison of our study with other similar studies in terms of type of arthroplasty, stage of surgery and revision surgery
| Ref. | Follow up period | Type of arthroplasty | Single vs two stages | Revision surgery | Limitation of study | Direction for future research |
| Our study | 18 months | Cemented/uncemented/hybrid | Single stage | 0 | Relatively short period of follow-up | Long follow-up is required to comment upon implant longevity |
| Yoon et al[15] | 4.8 years | Cementless | Single stage | 0 | Retrospective analysis of seven patients | Prospective study with a greater number of patients is desirable |
| Wang et al[35] | 49 months | Cementless/cemented | Single stage | 0 | ||
| Bhosale et al[33] | 10.5 years | Cemented/cementless/hybrid | - | 7 aseptic loosening | Although patients were evaluated in two phases, there is no patient with an active sinus | A comparative study with and without an active sinus will clarify the impact of sinus on disease recurrence |
| Zhang et al[44] | 41.6 months | - | 1/2/3 stage | 0 | Type of arthroplasty not mentioned | Type of THA (cemented vs cementless) should be clearly mentioned |
- Citation: Julfiqar M, Bin Sabir A, Bhateja D, Siddiqui YS, Alam A, Shoaib SM, Khan AQ, Asif N, Abbas M, Jilani LZ, Faizan M. Outcome of single-stage total hip arthroplasty in advanced active tubercular arthritis of the hip in Indian patients. World J Orthop 2026; 17(3): 113746
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i3/113746.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.113746