BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2026; 17(3): 113746
Published online Mar 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i3.113746
Table 5 Comparison of our study with other similar studies in terms of type of arthroplasty, stage of surgery and revision surgery
Ref.
Follow up period
Type of arthroplasty
Single vs two stages
Revision surgery
Limitation of study
Direction for future research
Our study18 monthsCemented/uncemented/hybridSingle stage0Relatively short period of follow-upLong follow-up is required to comment upon implant longevity
Yoon et al[15]4.8 yearsCementlessSingle stage0Retrospective analysis of seven patientsProspective study with a greater number of patients is desirable
Wang et al[35]49 monthsCementless/cementedSingle stage0
Bhosale et al[33]10.5 yearsCemented/cementless/hybrid-7 aseptic looseningAlthough patients were evaluated in two phases, there is no patient with an active sinusA comparative study with and without an active sinus will clarify the impact of sinus on disease recurrence
Zhang et al[44]41.6 months-1/2/3 stage0Type of arthroplasty not mentionedType of THA (cemented vs cementless) should be clearly mentioned


Write to the Help Desk