©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2026; 17(1): 114078
Published online Jan 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i1.114078
Published online Jan 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i1.114078
Table 2 Operative summary of patients with infected long stem revision
| Case | Operative knee | Pre-op revision implant | Fusion nail diameter (mm)/Length (mm) | Operative time (hours) | Estimated blood loss (mL) | Intra-operative transfusion (mL) |
| 1 | Right | Stryker triathlon revision CCK | 13/700 | 6 | 3600 | 1800 |
| 2 | Right | Biomet rotating hinge OSS | 11.5/700 | 8 | 3500 | 1800 |
| 3 | Right | Biomet vanguard revision SSK | 11.5/800 | 10 | 1500 | 1200 |
| 4 | Left | Biomet rotating hinge OSS | 11.5/700 | 10 | 400 | 300 |
- Citation: Georgiadis GM, Arefi IA, Drees SM, Nair A, Wagner D, Lawrence AC. Cephalomedullary fusion nails for treatment of infected stemmed revision total knee arthroplasty: Four case reports. World J Orthop 2026; 17(1): 114078
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i1/114078.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i1.114078