BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2026; 17(1): 110188
Published online Jan 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i1.110188
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plots comparing complications, reoperations, functional scores, and patient satisfaction between reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty. A: Forest plot comparing complication rates between reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA); B: Forest plot comparing reoperation rates between RTSA and TSA; C: Forest plot comparing Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores postoperatively between RTSA and TSA; D: Forest plot comparing University of California Los Angeles scores between RTSA and TSA; E: Forest plot comparing Simple Shoulder Test scores between RTSA and TSA; F: Forest plot comparing patient satisfaction rates between RTSA and TSA; G: Forest plot comparing Visual Analog Scale pain scores between RTSA and TSA; H: Forest plot comparing American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores between RTSA and TSA; I: Forest plot comparing Constant Scores between RTSA and TSA. CI: Confidence interval; RTSA: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; TSA: Total shoulder arthroplasty.


Write to the Help Desk