©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2025; 16(9): 110859
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i9.110859
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i9.110859
Table 5 Statistical comparison at 3-month follow-up
| Parameter | Deltoid split (mean ± SD) | Deltopectoral (mean ± SD) | P value |
| Numeric Rating Scale Score | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 5.9 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
| Quick-Disabilities in Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire | 25.4 ± 7.8 | 37.1 ± 6.9 | < 0.001 |
| Short Form Health Survey-12v2 | 32.6 ± 6.3 | 40.3 ± 5.4 | 0.003 |
| Constant-Murley | 68.2 ± 8.1 | 50.5 ± 9.4 | 0.002 |
- Citation: Cicio C, Longo G, Pavone V, Testa G, Ortuso R, Salvo GC, Ganci M, Prestianni I, Ferrara A, Kory A, Pietropaolo A, Monachino AM, Cuffaro ER, Papotto G. Deltopectoral vs deltoid split approach for proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate: Our experience. World J Orthop 2025; 16(9): 110859
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i9/110859.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i9.110859