Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2025; 16(6): 103832
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103832
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103832
Table 2 Statistical results for interphalangeal angle measurements
Statistical measure | AI vs OB | AI vs OA2 | OA2 vs OB |
ICC-absolute agreement | 0.88 (95%CI: 0.81-0.93) | 0.92 (95%CI: 0.86-0.95) | 0.95 (95%CI: 0.91-0.96) |
Interpretation | Good reliability | Excellent reliability | Excellent reliability |
ICC-consistency | N/A | N/A | 0.95 |
Interpretation | N/A | N/A | Excellent reliability |
Bland-Altman mean difference (bias) | 2.54° | 1.61° | 0.93° |
SD of differences | 3.06° | 3.35° | 2.26° |
Limits of agreement | -3.46° to 8.53° | -4.97° to 8.18° | -3.51° to 5.37° |
Interpretation | Minimal systematic bias | Minimal systematic bias | Minimal systematic bias |
Standard error of measurement | 2.09° | 1.77° | 1.22° |
Mean absolute error | 3.23° | 2.79° | 1.89° |
Interpretation | Low average difference, high precision | Low average difference, high precision | Low average difference, high precision |
Pearson correlation coefficient (r) | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.90 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Interpretation | Very strong positive correlation | Very strong positive correlation | Very strong positive correlation |
- Citation: Kwolek K, Gądek A, Kwolek K, Lechowska-Liszka A, Malczak M, Liszka H. Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of hallux valgus interphalangeus using anteroposterior foot radiographs. World J Orthop 2025; 16(6): 103832
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i6/103832.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103832