Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2025; 16(5): 105734
Published online May 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105734
Published online May 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105734
Table 2 Post-hoc analysis of data showing significant differences among groups
SCHF | DRF | Healthy volunteers | ||
Bauman angle | SCHF | NA | 0.586 | 0.013 |
DRF | 0.586 | NA | 0.409 | |
Healthy volunteers | 0.013 | 0.586 | NA | |
Humeroulnar angle | SCHF | NA | 0.055 | < 0.001 |
DRF | 0.055 | NA | 0.367 | |
Healthy volunteers | < 0.001 | 0.367 | NA | |
Humerus metaphysis-diaphysis angle | SCHF | NA | 0.160 | 0.001 |
DRF | 0.160 | NA | 0.187 | |
Healthy volunteers | 0.001 | 0.187 | NA |
- Citation: Ülgen NK, Gencer B, Doğan Ö. Comparative analysis of elbow radiographic measurements in patients with supracondylar humerus fractures and healthy controls. World J Orthop 2025; 16(5): 105734
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i5/105734.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105734