BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2025; 16(12): 110510
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i12.110510
Table 4 Results of other methods of spinal deformity correction by temporary internal distraction devices
Ref.
Sample size
Preoperative deformity
Deformity after temporary internal distraction (stage 1)
Deformity after final fusion (stage 2)
Complication
Blood loss
FEV1%
FVC%
Loss of correction at final follow up
Cheng et al[38]18Cobb angle: 129.8°; K angle: 94.7°Cobb angle: 70.5°; K angle: 46.2°Cobb angle: 51.8°; K angle: 32.9°Intraoperative loss of SSEP signals in 1 case; pleural effusion in 2 cases; subcutaneous hydrops in 1 case; no permanent neurodeficit, infection, implant failure211 mL in stage 1; 1597 mL in stage 258.6 to 67.6 (stage 1)
61.2 to 70.3 (stage 1)3.3° of coronal correction and 2.6° of sagittal correction lost at final follow up
Hu et al[37]11Cobb angle: 149°; K angle: 79°Cobb: 79°; K angle: 59°Cobb angle: 55°; K angle: 35°Paralytic ileus in 1 which resolved conservatively; no neurodeficit; no implant failure210 mL in stage 1; 1512 mL in stage 261.4 to 71.3 (stage 1); 71.3 to 76.3 (stage 2) 59.3 to 68.7 (stage 1); 68.7 to 71.2 (stage2)No significant deterioration in spinal alignment or PFT
Buchowski et al[35]10Cobb angle: 104°Cobb angle: 49°Cobb angle: 20°Spontaneous pneumothorax in one case; one death unrelated to surgery; no neurodeficit, infection or implant failureNRNRNRNR


Write to the Help Desk