BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2025; 16(11): 110251
Published online Nov 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.110251
Table 7 Comparison of current study with selected simulation-based orthopedic education studies
Ref.
Study design
Participants
Simulation modality
Outcomes measured
Key findings
Kelly et al[24], 2017Mixed-methods studyMedical studentsSimulated musculoskeletal environmentKnowledge, confidence, feedbackImproved self-efficacy and musculoskeletal exam skills
Butler et al[20], 2017Pre-post interventionInterns and studentsSupracondylar fracture simulatorTechnical skill, self-confidenceImproved skill performance and confidence post-training
Wilson et al[22], 2020Randomized crossover trialUndergraduate medical studentsVR and physical modelsKnowledge scores, retentionBoth modalities improved scores; VR had slightly higher retention
Klingebiel et al[21], 2024Experimental studyOrthopedic surgeonsPelvic fracture simulatorTechnical confidence, skill acquisitionSimulator enhanced emergency procedure readiness
Schöbel et al[23], 2024Prospective controlled trialMedical studentsImmersive VR for knee arthroscopyProcedural steps understanding, engagementVR significantly improved procedural knowledge and engagement
Our study, 2025Cross-sectional observational106 final-year MBBS studentsSynthetic bone models, plaster kitsProcedural accuracy, knowledge retention, confidenceSignificant improvements in all domains; prior exposure and academic scores were predictors of better outcomes


Write to the Help Desk