©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2025; 16(11): 110251
Published online Nov 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.110251
Published online Nov 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.110251
Table 7 Comparison of current study with selected simulation-based orthopedic education studies
| Ref. | Study design | Participants | Simulation modality | Outcomes measured | Key findings |
| Kelly et al[24], 2017 | Mixed-methods study | Medical students | Simulated musculoskeletal environment | Knowledge, confidence, feedback | Improved self-efficacy and musculoskeletal exam skills |
| Butler et al[20], 2017 | Pre-post intervention | Interns and students | Supracondylar fracture simulator | Technical skill, self-confidence | Improved skill performance and confidence post-training |
| Wilson et al[22], 2020 | Randomized crossover trial | Undergraduate medical students | VR and physical models | Knowledge scores, retention | Both modalities improved scores; VR had slightly higher retention |
| Klingebiel et al[21], 2024 | Experimental study | Orthopedic surgeons | Pelvic fracture simulator | Technical confidence, skill acquisition | Simulator enhanced emergency procedure readiness |
| Schöbel et al[23], 2024 | Prospective controlled trial | Medical students | Immersive VR for knee arthroscopy | Procedural steps understanding, engagement | VR significantly improved procedural knowledge and engagement |
| Our study, 2025 | Cross-sectional observational | 106 final-year MBBS students | Synthetic bone models, plaster kits | Procedural accuracy, knowledge retention, confidence | Significant improvements in all domains; prior exposure and academic scores were predictors of better outcomes |
- Citation: Manohar M, Selvaraj P, Selvaraj P, Jeyaraman N, Muthu S, Jeyaraman M. Enhancing orthopaedic competency through simulation: A student-centered approach to bridge educational gaps. World J Orthop 2025; 16(11): 110251
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i11/110251.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.110251