©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2025; 16(10): 110741
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741
Table 5 Surgical skin preparation demographics and results of studies evaluating spine surgery
| Ref. | Level of evidence | Surgery type | Sample size (n) | Interventions | Comparisons | Key findings |
| Dromzee et al[52], 2012, France | Randomized clinical trial (level 1) | Pediatric scoliosis | 56 | Cyanoacrylate liquid (N/A); no cyanoacrylate liquid | Comparison of surgical site infection | No statistically significant difference in surgical site infection |
| Ghobrial et al[53], 2018, United States | Prospective cohort (level 2) | All spine cases | 6959 | 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 7.5% povidone iodine solution (P) | Comparing culture rates and surgical site infections | There was no statistically significant difference between cohorts for culture growth or surgical site infections |
| Madariaga et al[54], 2024, United States | Retrospective comparative study (level 2) | Cervical spine | 86 | 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.77% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol and 3% hydrogen peroxide (S) | Comparing post prep C. acnes culture and surgical site infection | There was no statistically significant difference in culture rate between cohorts |
| Savage et al[55], 2012, United States | Randomized control trial (level 1) | Lumbar spine surgery | 100 | 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.7% available iodine in 74% isopropyl alcohol (S) | Comparing post prep culture rates and surgical site infection | There was no statistically significant difference in positive culture rate between cohorts |
| Yoshii et al[56], 2018, Japan | Prospective comparative study (level 2) | Posterior spine surgery | 190 | 0.5% chlorhexidine in 79% ethanol (S); 10% povidone iodine (P) | Comparing culture rate and surgical site infection | There was no significant difference in culture rates immediately after skin preparation (P = 0.49); the positive culture rate after wound closure was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine group than the iodine group (P = 0.046) |
- Citation: Puga TB, Box MW, Haechten T, Qureshi I, Riehl JT. Effectiveness of surgical skin preparation solutions in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review of the current comparative literature. World J Orthop 2025; 16(10): 110741
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i10/110741.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741