BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2025; 16(10): 110741
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741
Table 5 Surgical skin preparation demographics and results of studies evaluating spine surgery
Ref.
Level of evidence
Surgery type
Sample size (n)
Interventions
Comparisons
Key findings
Dromzee et al[52], 2012, FranceRandomized clinical trial (level 1)Pediatric scoliosis56Cyanoacrylate liquid (N/A); no cyanoacrylate liquidComparison of surgical site infectionNo statistically significant difference in surgical site infection
Ghobrial et al[53], 2018, United StatesProspective cohort (level 2)All spine cases69592% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 7.5% povidone iodine solution (P)Comparing culture rates and surgical site infectionsThere was no statistically significant difference between cohorts for culture growth or surgical site infections
Madariaga et al[54], 2024, United StatesRetrospective comparative study (level 2)Cervical spine860.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.77% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol and 3% hydrogen peroxide (S)Comparing post prep C. acnes culture and surgical site infectionThere was no statistically significant difference in culture rate between cohorts
Savage et al[55], 2012, United StatesRandomized control trial (level 1)Lumbar spine surgery1002% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.7% available iodine in 74% isopropyl alcohol (S)Comparing post prep culture rates and surgical site infectionThere was no statistically significant difference in positive culture rate between cohorts
Yoshii et al[56], 2018, JapanProspective comparative study (level 2)Posterior spine surgery1900.5% chlorhexidine in 79% ethanol (S); 10% povidone iodine (P)Comparing culture rate and surgical site infectionThere was no significant difference in culture rates immediately after skin preparation (P = 0.49); the positive culture rate after wound closure was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine group than the iodine group (P = 0.046)


Write to the Help Desk