©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2025; 16(10): 110741
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741
Table 4 Surgical skin preparation demographics and results of studies evaluating upper extremity surgery
| Ref. | Level of evidence | Surgery type | Sample size (n) | Interventions | Comparisons | Key findings |
| Blonna et al[42], 2018, Italy | Prospective comparative study (level 2) | Proximal humerus fracture | 40 | 1% povidone iodine in 50% isopropyl alcohol (P); 4% chlorhexidine followed by 1% povidone iodine in 50% isopropyl alcohol (P) | Comparison of positive culture rates | The 4% chlorhexidine followed by 1% povidone iodine in 50% isopropyl alcohol produced a significant decrease in positive coagulase-negative Staphylococci cultures when compared to the single preparation (P < 0.001) |
| Crutcher et al[43], 2024, United States | Randomized control trial (level 1) | Shoulders of volunteers | 72 | 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol alone (S); 3% hydrogen peroxide followed by 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S) | Comparison of culture growth for C. acnes | No statistically significant difference in culture rate between the two interventions |
| Dörfel et al[44], 2021, Germany | Prospective crossover (level 2) | Shoulders of volunteers | 16 | 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 3.24% povidone-iodine in 38.9% isopropyl alcohol and 37.3% ethanol (P) | Comparison of culture growth for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria | Aerobic skin flora was significantly reduced by povidone-iodine at 2.5 minutes of application than chlorhexidine (P = 0.04), but not at thirty minutes or three hours; anaerobic skin flora was significantly reduced by povidone-iodine at 2.5 minutes (P < 0.01) and 30 minutes (P < 0.01) of application than chlorhexidine, but not at three hours |
| Hancock et al[45], 2018, New Zealand | Randomized control trial (level 1) | Shoulder of volunteers | 22 | Two applications of 2% chlorhexidine in alcohol (S); 5% benzoyl peroxidase wash + 2% chlorhexidine in alcohol (S) | Comparison of culture growth for C. acnes of the anterior deltoid and axilla | No statistically significant difference in culture growth between the two groups |
| Mizels et al[46], 2024, United States | Prospective comparative study (level 3) | Total shoulder arthroplasty | 61 | 70% ethyl alcohol followed by two applications of 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 70% ethyl alcohol followed by hydrogen peroxide followed by two applications of 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S) | Comparison of patient reported outcomes, infection rate, and revision surgeries | No statistical difference was found in patient reported outcomes between groups; no statistical difference was found in revision or infection rate between groups |
| Saltzman et al[47], 2009, United States | Randomized control trial (level 1) | All shoulder surgeries | 150 | 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.7% iodophor 74% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.75% iodine scrub and 1.0% iodine paint (P) | Comparing positive culture rate of the different preparation methods | The positive culture rate was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine group than the iodophor (P = 0.01) or iodine paint (P < 0.001) groups; chlorhexidine and iodophor significantly reduced positive coagulase-negative Staphylococcus cultures (P < 0.001 for both groups); no significant difference noted for positive C. acnes cultures between the groups |
| Wade et al[51], 2021, United Kingdom | Prospective cohort (level 2) | Upper limb surgeries | 2454 | Aqueous or alcoholic chlorhexidine (P) (concentration unspecified); aqueous or alcoholic povidone-iodine (P) (concentration unspecified) | Comparison of 90 days SSI between the two groups | Alcoholic povidone iodine produced a decreased risk of SSI in emergency upper extremity surgery (HR = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.02-0.94); alcoholic chlorhexidine produced a decreased risk of SSI in elective upper extremity surgery (HR = 0.30; 95%CI: 0.11-0.83) |
| Xu et al[49], 2017, United States | Randomized control trial (level 1) | Hand surgery | 240 | 10% povidone-iodine (P); 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.7% iodine in 74% isopropyl alcohol (S) | Comparison of positive cultures | 1.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol had higher rates of positive cultures than the 10% povidone-iodine and 0.7% iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol groups (P < 0.001) |
| Yamakado[50], 2021, Japan | Randomized control trial (level 1) | Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair | 151 | 1% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); chlorhexidine alcohol with 3% hydrogen peroxide (S) | Comparison of the cultures of cut arthroscopic sutures and SSI | There was no statistically significant difference in the positive culture rate for C. acnes or number of SSI between the two groups |
- Citation: Puga TB, Box MW, Haechten T, Qureshi I, Riehl JT. Effectiveness of surgical skin preparation solutions in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review of the current comparative literature. World J Orthop 2025; 16(10): 110741
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i10/110741.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741