BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2025; 16(10): 110741
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110741
Table 4 Surgical skin preparation demographics and results of studies evaluating upper extremity surgery
Ref.
Level of evidence
Surgery type
Sample size (n)
Interventions
Comparisons
Key findings
Blonna et al[42], 2018, ItalyProspective comparative study (level 2)Proximal humerus fracture401% povidone iodine in 50% isopropyl alcohol (P); 4% chlorhexidine followed by 1% povidone iodine in 50% isopropyl alcohol (P)Comparison of positive culture ratesThe 4% chlorhexidine followed by 1% povidone iodine in 50% isopropyl alcohol produced a significant decrease in positive coagulase-negative Staphylococci cultures when compared to the single preparation (P < 0.001)
Crutcher et al[43], 2024, United StatesRandomized control trial (level 1)Shoulders of volunteers722% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol alone (S); 3% hydrogen peroxide followed by 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S)Comparison of culture growth for C. acnesNo statistically significant difference in culture rate between the two interventions
Dörfel et al[44], 2021, GermanyProspective crossover (level 2)Shoulders of volunteers162% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 3.24% povidone-iodine in 38.9% isopropyl alcohol and 37.3% ethanol (P)Comparison of culture growth for aerobic and anaerobic bacteriaAerobic skin flora was significantly reduced by povidone-iodine at 2.5 minutes of application than chlorhexidine (P = 0.04), but not at thirty minutes or three hours; anaerobic skin flora was significantly reduced by povidone-iodine at 2.5 minutes (P < 0.01) and 30 minutes (P < 0.01) of application than chlorhexidine, but not at three hours
Hancock et al[45], 2018, New ZealandRandomized control trial (level 1)Shoulder of volunteers22Two applications of 2% chlorhexidine in alcohol (S); 5% benzoyl peroxidase wash + 2% chlorhexidine in alcohol (S)Comparison of culture growth for C. acnes of the anterior deltoid and axillaNo statistically significant difference in culture growth between the two groups
Mizels et al[46], 2024, United StatesProspective comparative study (level 3)Total shoulder arthroplasty6170% ethyl alcohol followed by two applications of 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 70% ethyl alcohol followed by hydrogen peroxide followed by two applications of 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S)Comparison of patient reported outcomes, infection rate, and revision surgeriesNo statistical difference was found in patient reported outcomes between groups; no statistical difference was found in revision or infection rate between groups
Saltzman et al[47], 2009, United StatesRandomized control trial (level 1)All shoulder surgeries1502% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.7% iodophor 74% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.75% iodine scrub and 1.0% iodine paint (P)Comparing positive culture rate of the different preparation methodsThe positive culture rate was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine group than the iodophor (P = 0.01) or iodine paint (P < 0.001) groups; chlorhexidine and iodophor significantly reduced positive coagulase-negative Staphylococcus cultures (P < 0.001 for both groups); no significant difference noted for positive C. acnes cultures between the groups
Wade et al[51], 2021, United KingdomProspective cohort (level 2)Upper limb surgeries2454Aqueous or alcoholic chlorhexidine (P) (concentration unspecified); aqueous or alcoholic povidone-iodine (P) (concentration unspecified)Comparison of 90 days SSI between the two groupsAlcoholic povidone iodine produced a decreased risk of SSI in emergency upper extremity surgery (HR = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.02-0.94); alcoholic chlorhexidine produced a decreased risk of SSI in elective upper extremity surgery (HR = 0.30; 95%CI: 0.11-0.83)
Xu et al[49], 2017, United StatesRandomized control trial (level 1)Hand surgery24010% povidone-iodine (P); 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); 0.7% iodine in 74% isopropyl alcohol (S)Comparison of positive cultures1.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol had higher rates of positive cultures than the 10% povidone-iodine and 0.7% iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol groups (P < 0.001)
Yamakado[50], 2021, JapanRandomized control trial (level 1)Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair1511% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (S); chlorhexidine alcohol with 3% hydrogen peroxide (S)Comparison of the cultures of cut arthroscopic sutures and SSIThere was no statistically significant difference in the positive culture rate for C. acnes or number of SSI between the two groups


Write to the Help Desk