©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2025; 16(10): 108858
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.108858
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.108858
Table 1 Peak Torque variables for the four movements studied (n = 200)
| Range of motion | Average | Median | SD | P value | |
| Eversion | Dominant | 28.7 | 28.3 | 9.8 | < 0.001 |
| Non-dominant | 31.2 | 30.6 | 10.8 | ||
| Inversion | Dominant | 34.6 | 31.8 | 12.2 | 0.466 |
| Non-dominant | 35.1 | 33.4 | 11,.0 | ||
| Extension | Dominant | 47.9 | 48.1 | 14.3 | 0.029 |
| Non-dominant | 49.4 | 50.5 | 14.3 | ||
| Flexion | Dominant | 136.4 | 140.0 | 43.5 | < 0.001 |
| Non-dominant | 144.0 | 146.8 | 43.7 | ||
- Citation: da Fonseca LF, Jeyaraman M, Jeyaraman N, Inojossa TR, Maciel ES, Cesar Netto C, Mansur NS, Astur DC. Normative values of ankle strength and its importance for rehabilitation and return to activity: A cross-sectional study. World J Orthop 2025; 16(10): 108858
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i10/108858.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.108858