©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2022; 13(9): 825-836
Published online Sep 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825
Published online Sep 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825
Table 1 Included randomized controlled trials with characteristics
| First author (last name) | Journal | Year | Comparison | Patients enrolled | Patients lost to follow up | Final study, n | JADAD score | Power analysis |
| Kim | J Orthop Trauma | 2015 | ORPO (LCP) vs MIPO | 72 | 4 | 68 | 3 | Yes |
| Esmailiejah | Trauma Mon | 2015 | ORPO (DCP) vs MIPO | 68 | 3 | 65 | 3 | No |
| Fan | Orthopedics | 2015 | ORPO (LCP) vs IMN | 60 | 0 | 60 | 2 | Yes |
| Hadhoud | Menoufia Medical Journal | 2015 | ORPO (LCP) vs MIPO | 30 | 0 | 30 | 2 | No |
| Wali | Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr | 2014 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 50 | 0 | 50 | 2 | No |
| Benegas | J Shoulder Elbow Surg | 2014 | MIPO vs IMN | 41 | 1 | 40 | 3 | Yes |
| Lian | Orthopedics | 2013 | MIPO vs IMN | 56 | 9 | 47 | 3 | No |
| Li | J Shoulder Elbow Surg | 2011 | ORPO (LCP) vs IMN | 50 | 5 | 45 | 3 | Yes |
| Iqbal | Annals of King Edward Medical University | 2011 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 40 | 0 | 40 | 3 | No |
| Singisetti | Int Orthop | 2010 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 45 | 9 | 36 | 1 | No |
| Putti | J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) | 2009 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 34 | 0 | 34 | 2 | No |
| Changulani | Int Orthop | 2007 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 47 | 2 | 45 | 3 | No |
| Kesemenli | Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc | 2003 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 60 | 0 | 60 | 2 | No |
| McCormack | J Bone Joint Surg (Br) | 2000 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 44 | 3 | 41 | 2 | No |
| Chapman | J Orthop Trauma | 2000 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 89 | 5 | 84 | 3 | No |
- Citation: Morris SC, Gowd AK, Agarwalla A, Phipatanakul WP, Amin NH, Liu JN. Fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2022; 13(9): 825-836
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i9/825.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825