©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2022; 13(2): 139-149
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.139
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.139
Table 1 Patient and radiological characteristics
| Patient characteristic | (n = 100) |
| Female, % | 72 |
| Age, mean (range) | 66.7 (41-90) |
| BMI, mean (range) | 27.3 (18.7-42.8) |
| Right hip, % | 54 |
| Indication, % | |
| Primary coxarthrosis | 98 |
| Perthes coxarthrosis | 1 |
| Posttraumatic coxarthrosis | 1 |
| Femoral offset (mm), mean (range) | 47 (30.5-67) |
| Acetabular offset (mm), mean (range) | 32.5 (22.5-47.5) |
| Femoro-acetabular offset (mm), mean (range) | 80 (62-113) |
| CCD-angle (°) | 128.6 (114.5-146) |
- Citation: de Waard S, Verboom T, Bech NH, Sierevelt IN, Kerkhoffs GM, Haverkamp D. Femoroacetabular offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty; Digital templating a short stem vs a conventional stem. World J Orthop 2022; 13(2): 139-149
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i2/139.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.139