©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2020; 11(4): 232-242
Published online Apr 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.232
Published online Apr 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.232
Table 2 Arthritis type bone morphology and radiological findings
| n (%) | |
| Arthritistype | |
| Primaryosteoarthritis | 33 (54.9) |
| Dysplasia (type A)1 | 13 (21.6) |
| Low dislocation (type B)1 | 2 (3.9) |
| Osteonecrosis | 7 (11.8) |
| Post traumaticarthrtis | 4 (5.9) |
| Other | 1 (2.0) |
| Previous operation (osteotomy, Fracture fixation) | 6 (9.8) |
| Proximal femoral morphology (Dorr type) | |
| A | 11 (17.6) |
| B | 48 (78.4) |
| C | 2 (3.9) |
| Ectopic ossification (Brooker classification) | |
| All | 11 (17.6) |
| Class 1 | 6 (9.8) |
| Class 2 | 5 (7.8) |
| Modified Gruen zones | |
| Radiolucent lines | 0 |
| Reactive lines (zones 3, 4, 5) | 2 (3.3) |
| Cortical hypertrophy (zones 3, 5) | 4 (6.6) |
| Subsidencein mm2 | 1.8 ± 0.9 (0.0-3.9) |
| Leg length discrepancy in mm2 | 1.7 ± 5.4 (-17-19) |
- Citation: Drosos GI, Tottas S, Kougioumtzis I, Tilkeridis K, Chatzipapas C, Ververidis A. Total hip replacement using MINIMA® short stem: A short-term follow-up study. World J Orthop 2020; 11(4): 232-242
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i4/232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.232