Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2025; 16(8): 109419
Published online Aug 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109419
Published online Aug 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109419
Table 3 Comparison of all-cause adverse events between the combination group and monotherapy group following propensity score matching, n (%)
Variable | Combination group (n = 72) | Monotherapy group (n = 72) |
Patients with an adverse event from any cause | 48 (66.6) | 35 (48.6) |
Grade 1 or 2 event | 34 (47.2) | 28 (38.9) |
Grade 3 event | 12 (16.7) | 7 (9.7) |
Grade 4 event | 2 (2.7) | 0 |
Grade 5 event | 0 | 0 |
Dose interruption of PD-(L)1 inhibitors | 5 (6.9) | 0 |
Dose interruption of molecular targeted therapies | 7 (9.7) | 0 |
Dose reduction of PD-(L)1 inhibitors | 8 (11.1) | 0 |
Dose reduction of molecular targeted therapies | 12 (16.6) | 0 |
- Citation: Jiao HY, Yan XM, Li JX, Zhang ZG. Combination therapy reduces transarterial chemoembolization resistance in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(8): 109419
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i8/109419.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109419