Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Jul 24, 2025; 16(7): 107781
Published online Jul 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i7.107781
Table 10 Liquid biopsy in the diagnosis of gall bladder cancer
Liquid biopsy
Detection method
Sensitivity and specificity
Implementation barrier in early diagnosis
Ref.
CTCFlow cytometric detection, nano microfluid chip, immunoaffinity (EpCAM), microfiltration (ISET)55.6%, 100.0%Very low detection rate in early stage[193]
CTCs in peripheral blood (approximately 1 CTC per 106-10 Leukocytes)
Large blood volume required to detect CTC
Short half-life of CTC makes it difficult to analyse
miRNAsqRT-PCR, microarrays, NGS80%-90%, 80%-90%miRNA expression can vary depending on samples[198,199]
Delay in processing, and temperature fluctuations can alter miRNA levels
Low abudance, platform dependency, lack of standardization, high cost
LncRNAqRT-PCR, microarrays, NGS84%-100%Low abundance, delay in processing, and temperature fluctuations can alter miRNA levels[198,199]
Platform dependency, lack of standardization, high cost
ctDNA/cfDNAqPCR, dPCR, ddPCR, NGS, high-throughput quantitative methylation assays78%-100%, 80%-100%Separation of ctDNA from the cfDNA (mixture of non-mutant tumor DNA, normal DNA and tumor DNA) is technically challenging[200,201]
RBBSHigh false negative rate because of tumor heterogenicity
ctDNA used for genetic testing only 0.01% of tumor
Limited representation of tumor environment
No standardization and no universally accepted cutoff for detection
High cost
Low availability
Bile as liquid biopsyqRT-PCR, microarrays, NGS45.8% and 99.9%Invasive methods to aspirate bile from GB[202]
No standardized methods and cutoff value