Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Jul 24, 2025; 16(7): 107781
Published online Jul 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i7.107781
Published online Jul 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i7.107781
Table 10 Liquid biopsy in the diagnosis of gall bladder cancer
Liquid biopsy | Detection method | Sensitivity and specificity | Implementation barrier in early diagnosis | Ref. |
CTC | Flow cytometric detection, nano microfluid chip, immunoaffinity (EpCAM), microfiltration (ISET) | 55.6%, 100.0% | Very low detection rate in early stage | [193] |
CTCs in peripheral blood (approximately 1 CTC per 106-10 Leukocytes) | ||||
Large blood volume required to detect CTC | ||||
Short half-life of CTC makes it difficult to analyse | ||||
miRNAs | qRT-PCR, microarrays, NGS | 80%-90%, 80%-90% | miRNA expression can vary depending on samples | [198,199] |
Delay in processing, and temperature fluctuations can alter miRNA levels | ||||
Low abudance, platform dependency, lack of standardization, high cost | ||||
LncRNA | qRT-PCR, microarrays, NGS | 84%-100% | Low abundance, delay in processing, and temperature fluctuations can alter miRNA levels | [198,199] |
Platform dependency, lack of standardization, high cost | ||||
ctDNA/cfDNA | qPCR, dPCR, ddPCR, NGS, high-throughput quantitative methylation assays | 78%-100%, 80%-100% | Separation of ctDNA from the cfDNA (mixture of non-mutant tumor DNA, normal DNA and tumor DNA) is technically challenging | [200,201] |
RBBS | High false negative rate because of tumor heterogenicity | |||
ctDNA used for genetic testing only 0.01% of tumor | ||||
Limited representation of tumor environment | ||||
No standardization and no universally accepted cutoff for detection | ||||
High cost | ||||
Low availability | ||||
Bile as liquid biopsy | qRT-PCR, microarrays, NGS | 45.8% and 99.9% | Invasive methods to aspirate bile from GB | [202] |
No standardized methods and cutoff value |
- Citation: Sarangi Y, Kumar A. Early detection of gallbladder cancer: Current status and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(7): 107781
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i7/107781.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i7.107781