©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2021; 12(4): 195-216
Published online Apr 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i4.195
Published online Apr 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i4.195
Table 1 Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation
| Levels of evidence | |
| I | Evidence from at least one large RCT of good methodological quality (low potential for bias) or meta-analyses of well-conducted randomised trials without heterogeneity |
| II | Small or large RCTs with suspicion of bias (lower methodological quality) or meta-analyses of such trials with demonstrated heterogeneity |
| III | Prospective cohort studies |
| IV | Retrospective cohort studies or case-control studies |
| V | Studies without control group, case reports, expert opinions |
| Grades of recommendation | |
| A | Strong evidence for efficacy with a substantial benefit, strongly recommended |
| B | Strong or moderate evidence for efficacy but with a limited clinical benefit, generally recommended |
| C | Insufficient evidence for efficacy or benefit does not outweigh the risk or the disadvantages (adverse events, costs, etc.), optional |
| D | Moderate evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, generally not recommended |
| E | Strong evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, never recommended |
- Citation: Rico M, Flamarique S, Casares C, García T, López M, Martínez M, Serrano J, Blanco M, Hernanz R, de Ingunza-Barón L, Marcos FJ, Couñago F. GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for thymic epithelial tumours. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(4): 195-216
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i4/195.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i4.195