BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Jun 5, 2026; 17(2): 114292
Published online Jun 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v17.i2.114292
Table 1 Emerging biomarkers in celiac disease
Biomarker
Biological basis
Clinical application
Diagnostic performance
Ref.
Faecal/urinary GIPPartially digested gluten fragments in urine/faecesObjective assessment of GFD adherence; detects recent gluten ingestionNo fixed sensitivity/specificity for gluten exposure (depends on timing of collection; short detection window (24-48 hours)[41-45]
Repeated GIP testing correlates with mucosal status but does not independently predict healing
tTG-neo antibodiesAntibodies to neo-epitopes formed by tTG-gliadin complexesDiagnosis of active CeDSensitivity 98%-100%, specificity 93%-96% [vs anti tTG antibodies (sensitivity 74%-100%, specificity 78%-100%)][46-48,58]
Accuracy for detecting villous atrophy in GFD patients: 90%, higher than other serologic tests
HLA DQ2 gliadin tetramer assayIdentifies circulating gluten-specific CD4+ T cellsDiagnosis of CeD even if patients are on GFDOn GFD, sensitivity 97%, specificity 95%[51]
On gluten diet, sensitivity 100%, specificity 90%
Serum IL-2 rise post gluten challengeRapid cytokine surge reflecting acute gluten-specific T-cell activationDetects acute gluten exposureNo validated sensitivity/specificity reported yet; consistent IL-2 peak at about 4 hours after gluten ingestion[52-54]
Circulating microRNAsAltered expression patterns reflect mucosal injuryExploratory diagnostic biomarkerNo validated sensitivity/specificity[56,57]


Write to the Help Desk