©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Mar 5, 2026; 17(1): 114412
Published online Mar 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v17.i1.114412
Published online Mar 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v17.i1.114412
Table 2 Comparative context for biologic switch strategies after ustekinumab failure in Crohn’s disease
| Parameter | Risankizumab | Vedolizumab | Anti-TNF |
| Ref. | Colwill et al[6], 2025 | Bressler et al[14], 2021 | Allez et al[15], 2010 |
| Study design | Single-center retrospective | Multicenter retrospective | Various retrospective |
| Sample size (n) | 51 | 78 | Approximately 50-100 per cohort |
| Follow-up | 9 months | 12 months | 6-12 months |
| Clinical remission rate | 94.4% (34/36) | 39% (at 12 months) | Approximately 20%-40% (variable) |
| Biomarker improvement (CRP/FCal) | Significant (P < 0.001) | Modest | Modest to significant |
| Key strengths | High remission rates; excellent safety profile in this cohort | Distinct gut-selective mechanism; well-established safety | Extensive clinical experience; potential for dose optimization |
| Key limitations | Single-center; no endoscopic data; potential for selection bias | Lower remission rates in this setting | Immunogenicity; potential for attenuated response in later lines of therapy |
- Citation: Omullo FP. Risankizumab redefines Crohn’s treatment after ustekinumab failure. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2026; 17(1): 114412
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v17/i1/114412.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v17.i1.114412