©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Dec 5, 2025; 16(4): 111502
Published online Dec 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i4.111502
Published online Dec 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i4.111502
Table 1 Comparative analysis of conventional oral supplements and nanoliposomal delivery systems
| Aspect | Conventional oral supplements | Nanoliposomal delivery systems |
| Gastric stability | Low: Vulnerable to acidic pH and enzymatic degradation | High: Encapsulation within phospholipid bilayers confers protection against gastric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis |
| Intestinal absorption | Limited: Constrained by poor solubility and epithelial permeability | Enhanced: Improved solubility and interaction with enterocyte uptake mechanisms (e.g., endocytosis) |
| First-pass metabolism | Pronounced: Hepatic metabolism via portal vein reduces bioactivity | Attenuated: Lymphatic transport via chylomicrons partially circumvents hepatic first-pass metabolism |
| Systemic distribution | Non-specific: Diffuse dilution across systemic tissues | Targeted: Surface ligands enable receptor-mediated delivery to specific tissues |
| Bioavailability | Suboptimal: High doses required to achieve therapeutic levels | Superior: Increased efficiency permits lower effective doses |
| Therapeutic index | Variable: Elevated doses may precipitate gastrointestinal adverse effects | Optimized: Targeted delivery enhances efficacy while minimizing off-target toxicity |
- Citation: Mercola J. Targeted nanoliposomal nutrient delivery for human health. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2025; 16(4): 111502
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v16/i4/111502.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i4.111502