BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Dec 5, 2025; 16(4): 111502
Published online Dec 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i4.111502
Table 1 Comparative analysis of conventional oral supplements and nanoliposomal delivery systems
Aspect
Conventional oral supplements
Nanoliposomal delivery systems
Gastric stabilityLow: Vulnerable to acidic pH and enzymatic degradationHigh: Encapsulation within phospholipid bilayers confers protection against gastric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis
Intestinal absorptionLimited: Constrained by poor solubility and epithelial permeabilityEnhanced: Improved solubility and interaction with enterocyte uptake mechanisms (e.g., endocytosis)
First-pass metabolismPronounced: Hepatic metabolism via portal vein reduces bioactivityAttenuated: Lymphatic transport via chylomicrons partially circumvents hepatic first-pass metabolism
Systemic distributionNon-specific: Diffuse dilution across systemic tissuesTargeted: Surface ligands enable receptor-mediated delivery to specific tissues
BioavailabilitySuboptimal: High doses required to achieve therapeutic levelsSuperior: Increased efficiency permits lower effective doses
Therapeutic indexVariable: Elevated doses may precipitate gastrointestinal adverse effectsOptimized: Targeted delivery enhances efficacy while minimizing off-target toxicity


Write to the Help Desk