BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Dec 5, 2025; 16(4): 109485
Published online Dec 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i4.109485
Table 1 Comparing common prognostic indices for drug-induced liver injury, highlighting key differences in purpose, application, interpretation, and application
Metric
Purpose
Key parameters
Interpretation
Application
CTCAE (ICI hepatitis)Grading severity for oncologic toxicityALT, AST, bilirubin, symptoms (e.g., jaundice)Grade 1-5 (mild to death)-determines ICI holding/resuming, steroid initiationOncology (especially in immunotherapy)
MELD scorePredict liver-related mortalityBilirubin, INR, Creatinine (± Na, albumin)Numerical score → mortality prediction, transplant priorityCirrhosis, acute liver failure, transplant prioritization
Hy’s lawIdentify serious DILI riskALT or AST > 3 × ULN AND total bilirubin > 2 × ULN without obstructionSignals risk of serious hepatotoxicity in idiosyncratic DILI. Predicts about 10% risk of death or transplant in DILI casesDrug safety (clinical trials, post-market surveillance)
Modified Hy’s lawImprove prediction of DILI-related outcomesSimilar to Hy’s but may use ALP and stricter temporal linkageMore clinically specific/refined for assessing hepatotoxicity riskAdaptation for real-world/Lab data


Write to the Help Desk