BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2025; 16(3): 110709
Published online Sep 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i3.110709
Table 5 Comparison of the hepatic efficacy (categorical) outcomes in the efruxifermin vs placebo arms
Outcome variables (categorical)EFX dose (mg)No. of study reportsNo. of participants with outcome/participants analyzed (n/N)
Pooled effect size, RR (95%CI)P value
(EFX vs placebo)
I2 (%)P value (EFX 28 vs 50)
EFX arm
Placebo arm
Reduction in HFF ≥ 30%28248/5411/624.73 (2.54 to 8.82)< 0.00001160.98
50248/5211/624.79 (2.76 to 8.30)< 0.000014
Reduction in HFF ≥ 50%28235/542/6219.06 (4.82 to 75.40)< 0.000101.0
50244/522/6219.03 (5.68 to 63.78)< 0.000010
HFF ≤ 5%28217/542/628.71 (2.06 to 36.75)0.00300.70
50341/683/7212.45 (4.09 to 37.93)< 0.000010
Decrease in NAS ≥ 2 50217/252/71.96 (0.64 to 5.99)0.240NA
MASH resolution and improvement in fibrosis stage28215/512/434.59 (1.29 to 16.25)0.0200.72
50219/472/436.33 (1.83 to 21.90)0.0040
MASH resolution and no worsening of fibrosis stage28224/516 433.19 (1.47 to 6.93)0.00300.43
50336/596/484.89 (2.41 to 9.91)< 0.00010
Fibrosis regression by ≥ 1 stage and no worsening in steatohepatitis28342/10819/1042.06 (1.28 to 3.30)0.00300.61
50455/12219/1092.44 (1.55 to 3.83)0.00010
Fibrosis regression by ≥ 2 stage and no worsening in steatohepatitis2829/512/432.68 (0.70 to 10.18)0.1501.00
5029/472/432.68 (0.69 to 10.38) 0.150