Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2025; 16(3): 110709
Published online Sep 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i3.110709
Published online Sep 5, 2025. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i3.110709
Table 2 Comparison of the general safety outcomes in the efruxifermin vs placebo arms
Outcome variables | EFX dose (mg) | No. of study reports | No. of participants with outcome/participants analyzed | Pooled effect size, RR (95%CI) | P value (EFX vs placebo) | I2 (%) | P value (EFX 28 vs 50) | |
EFX arm | Placebo arm | |||||||
Any TEAE | 28 | 3 | 110/116 | 113/125 | 1.03 (0.96-1.10) | 0.39 | 9 | 0.56 |
50 | 4 | 141/145 | 121/135 | 1.05 (1.00-1.11) | 0.04 | 0 | ||
Drug-related TEAE | 28 | 3 | 79/116 | 58/125 | 1.45 (1.16-1.82) | 0.001 | 0 | 0.38 |
50 | 4 | 110/145 | 61/135 | 1.67 (1.36-2.05) | < 0.00001 | 0 | ||
Severe TEAE | 28 | 2 | 1/59 | 1/64 | 1.11 (0.07-16.47) | 0.94 | NA | 0.70 |
50 | 3 | 2/82 | 1/74 | 2.21 (0.22-22.47) | 0.50 | NA | ||
TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation | 28 | 3 | 10/116 | 3/125 | 3.15 (0.96-10.35) | 0.06 | 0 | 0.97 |
50 | 5 | 16/166 | 3/145 | 3.05 (1.06-8.81) | 0.04 | 0 | ||
Serious AE | 28 | 3 | 16/116 | 11/125 | 1.51 (0.77-2.97) | 0.23 | 0 | 0.89 |
50 | 5 | 19/166 | 12/145 | 1.35 (0.30-6.11) | 0.70 | 40 | ||
Abdominal pain | 28 | 2 | 10/76 | 8/82 | 1.35 (0.56-3.21) | 0.50 | 0 | 0.84 |
50 | 2 | 8/82 | 8 /82 | 1.13 (0.27-4.69) | 0.87 | 37 | ||
Nausea | 28 | 3 | 36/116 | 29/125 | 1.38 (0.66-2.91) | 0.39 | 53 | 0.55 |
50 | 5 | 68/166 | 32/145 | 1.78 (1.25-2.54) | 0.001 | 0 | ||
Vomiting | 28 | 3 | 28/116 | 12/125 | 2.17 (1.16-4.08) | 0.02 | 0 | 0.57 |
50 | 4 | 27/145 | 12/135 | 1.80 (0.95-3.39) | 0.07 | 0 | ||
Diarrhea | 28 | 2 | 29/76 | 22/82 | 1.42 (0.90-2.24) | 0.13 | 0 | 0.45 |
50 | 4 | 59/123 | 26/102 | 1.90 (1.04-3.49) | 0.04 | 36 | ||
Frequent bowel movements | 28 | 2 | 12/59 | 1/64 | 8.98 (1.71-47.13) | 0.009 | 0 | 0.26 |
50 | 2 | 2/62 | 1/64 | 1.43 (0.09-22.30) | 0.80 | 37 | ||
Increased appetite | 28 | 3 | 21/116 | 7/125 | 3.16 (1.39-7.20) | 0.0006 | 0 | 0.30 |
50 | 4 | 45/146 | 7/135 | 5.66 (2.71-11.82) | < 0.00001 | 0 | ||
Fatigue | 28 | 2 | 12/76 | 12/82 | 1.04 (0.51-2.14) | 0.90 | 0 | 0.73 |
50 | 2 | 11/82 | 12/82 | 0.87 (0.42-1.83) | 0.72 | 0 | ||
Headache | 28 | 2 | 14/97 | 13/104 | 1.15 (0.57-2.33) | 0.69 | 0 | 0.68 |
50 | 3 | 22/126 | 14/114 | 1.41 (0.75-2.65) | 0.29 | 0 | ||
Injection site erythema | 28 | 3 | 23/116 | 14/125 | 1.66 (0.88-3.14) | 0.12 | 4 | 0.89 |
50 | 4 | 30/145 | 14/135 | 1.77 (0.95-3.32) | 0.07 | 5 | ||
Injection site reaction | 28 | 3 | 16/116 | 14/125 | 1.17 (0.60-2.28) | 0.65 | 0 | 0.51 |
50 | 4 | 26/145 | 14/135 | 1.71 (0.67-4.39) | 0.26 | 21 |
- Citation: Kamrul-Hasan ABM, Borozan S, Jena S, Nagendra L, Dutta D, Bhattacharya S, Islam MS, Pappachan JM. Safety and efficacy of efruxifermin in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2025; 16(3): 110709
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v16/i3/110709.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i3.110709