Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Sep 22, 2026; 17(3): 122115
Published online Sep 22, 2026. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.122115
Published online Sep 22, 2026. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.122115
Table 3 Hemodynamics of gastric varices based on cross-sectional imaging classification, along with their preferred and alternative interventions
| Type | Venous anatomy | Venographic/hemodynamic findings ⇨ key issue | Preferred intervention | Alternative intervention | Key technical notes during RTO | |
| Efferent venous pattern | ||||||
| A | Single draining shunt (usually gastrorenal; rarely gastrocaval); no collaterals | Complete opacification of the varix on balloon-occluded venography | Standard BRTO | PARTO/CARTO/EUS-guided | Deep microcatheter placement ⇨ inject sclerosant till minimal afferent filling | |
| B1/B2 | Single shunt + small/multiple collateral veins | Incomplete opacification due to preferential collateral flow ⇨ Collateral “leak” | Modify the flow to isolate the varix by coil/plug embolization | EUS-guided | Balloon beyond collaterals; deep positioning ⇨ flow-directed embolization ⇨ microcatheter beyond collaterals ⇨ sclerosant | |
| B3 | Single shunt + large collateral veins | Poor opacification until collaterals are controlled ⇨ Significant collateral drainage | Pre-embolize collaterals ⇨ BRTO | EUS-guided | Selective catheterization ⇨ coil embolization ⇨ repeat venography | |
| C1 | Two shunts (gastrorenal + small gastrocaval) | Partial opacification due to the second shunt ⇨ Additional minor outflow | Eliminate second shunt ⇨ treat as B3 | BATO/PTO/trans-TIPS access/EUS-guided | Coil embolization of the gastrocaval shunt via microcatheter | |
| C2 | Two large shunts (gastrorenal + gastrocaval) | Incomplete opacification due to dual drainage ⇨ Major dual outflow | EUS-guided/BATO/PTO/trans-TIPS access | Combined BRTO approaches for dual shunt control | Dual balloon occlusion (gastrorenal + IJV gastrocaval) ⇨ then sclerosant | |
| D | No shunt | No large draining shunt ⇨ No retrograde access possible | TIPS (± embolization) | BATO/PTO/EUS-guided | - | |
| Afferent venous pattern | ||||||
| Type 1 | Single afferent vein supplying gastric varix | Sclerosant stagnates with minimal reflux into the afferent vein ⇨ Risk of excessive reflux into the portal vein if over-injected | Standard BRTO | EUS-guided | Endpoint = minimal afferent vein filling; avoid forceful injection | |
| Type 2 | Two afferent veins (left + posterior gastric veins) | Reflux preferentially into the lower-pressure vein ⇨ Partial obliteration due to persistent higher-pressure inflow | Staged BRTO is often required after coil/glue embolization of feeders | BRTO + TIPS if associated esophageal varices present/EUS-guided | Endpoint = reflux in one vein; repeat the session for the remaining varix | |
| Type 3 | Separate afferent vein drains directly into the shunt (no variceal communication) | Sclerosant preferentially flows into this vein ⇨ portal reflux ⇨ Ineffective variceal filling + risk of portal spill | BRTO + Selective embolization of the aberrant afferent vein | EUS-guided | Deep microcatheter positioning; embolize extra afferent (transhepatic/transjugular) if needed | |
- Citation: Giri S, Patel RK, Tripathy TP, Praharaj DL, Chavan R. Pathophysiological management of gastric varices: From hemodynamics to targeted therapies. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2026; 17(3): 122115
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5330/full/v17/i3/122115.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.122115