BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Sep 22, 2026; 17(3): 122115
Published online Sep 22, 2026. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.122115
Table 1 Classification of gastric varices based on venographic and angiographic findings
Classification
Basis
Types/grades
Key features
Clinical relevance
Hirota classificationBRTO findingsGrade 1-5Grade 1-2: Good opacification, minimal collaterals. Grade 3 Partial opacification with collaterals. Grade 4-5: Poor/no opacification, extensive collaterals or large shuntPredicts the feasibility and success of BRTO; higher grades = lower success
Fukuda classificationDominance of afferent (feeding) veins on angiographyType 1-4Type 1 Left gastric vein dominant. Type 2 mixed (LGV + posterior/short gastric). Type 3 complex bilateral supply. Type 4 right-sided dominanceHelps identify inflow patterns and guides selective embolization
Matsumoto classificationFlow dynamics in gastrorenal shunt and LGVType 1-2Type 1 portosystemic flow present. Type 2 portosystemic flow absent. Subtypes based on flow in LGV: A (hepatopetal)/B (hepatofugal)Predicts worsening of esophageal varices after BRTO (higher risk in Type 1B)


Write to the Help Desk