Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Sep 22, 2026; 17(3): 122115
Published online Sep 22, 2026. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.122115
Published online Sep 22, 2026. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.122115
Table 1 Classification of gastric varices based on venographic and angiographic findings
| Classification | Basis | Types/grades | Key features | Clinical relevance |
| Hirota classification | BRTO findings | Grade 1-5 | Grade 1-2: Good opacification, minimal collaterals. Grade 3 Partial opacification with collaterals. Grade 4-5: Poor/no opacification, extensive collaterals or large shunt | Predicts the feasibility and success of BRTO; higher grades = lower success |
| Fukuda classification | Dominance of afferent (feeding) veins on angiography | Type 1-4 | Type 1 Left gastric vein dominant. Type 2 mixed (LGV + posterior/short gastric). Type 3 complex bilateral supply. Type 4 right-sided dominance | Helps identify inflow patterns and guides selective embolization |
| Matsumoto classification | Flow dynamics in gastrorenal shunt and LGV | Type 1-2 | Type 1 portosystemic flow present. Type 2 portosystemic flow absent. Subtypes based on flow in LGV: A (hepatopetal)/B (hepatofugal) | Predicts worsening of esophageal varices after BRTO (higher risk in Type 1B) |
- Citation: Giri S, Patel RK, Tripathy TP, Praharaj DL, Chavan R. Pathophysiological management of gastric varices: From hemodynamics to targeted therapies. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2026; 17(3): 122115
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5330/full/v17/i3/122115.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.122115