Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Apr 12, 2020; 11(2): 32-42
Published online Apr 12, 2020. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v11.i2.32
Table 1 Characteristics of the patient cohort (n = 31) who were switched from balsalazide (due to shortage) to an alternative aminosalicylate formulation
VariablePre-switch (baseline)Post-switch (at subsequent review)1
Age (yr) (median, range)54 (20-79)
Male sex (%)16 (51.6)
Disease duration (yr) (median, range)10 (3-48)
Montreal Classification, n (%)
Disease extent
Proctitis (E1)4 (12.9)
Left sided colitis (E2)21 (67.7)
Extensive colitis (E3)6 (19.4)
Disease severity
Clinical remission (S0)14 (45.2)10 (32.2)
Mild (S1)16 (51.6)15 (48.4)
Moderate (S2)1 (3.2)6 (19.4)
Severe (S3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Endoscopic (Mayo) subscore, n (%)
Mayo 06 (19.4)13 (41.9)
Mayo 19 (29.0)9 (29.0)
Mayo 213 (41.9)5 (16.1)
Mayo 33 (9.7)3 (9.7)
Endoscopic remission (Mayo 0/1)15 (48.4)22 (71.0)
Alternative 5-ASA formulation switched to
MMX mesalazine28 (90.3)
Time-dependent, ethylcellulose coated22 (6.5)
Sulfasalazine1 (3.2)
Median balsalazide dose (g, range)5.3 (3.0-9.0)-
Median equivalent mesalazine dose (g, range)32.1 (1.1-3.2)3.6 (2.0-4.8)
Concurrent Medical therapy, n (%)
Nil other7 (22.6)
Topical aminosalicylate10 (32.2)
Oral corticosteroid1 (3.2)
Azathioprine/mercaptopurine14 (45.2)
Methotrexate3 (9.7)
Anti-TNF biologic0 (0.0)
Other biologic0 (0.0)